Ξ welcome to cryptostorm's member forums ~ you don't have to be a cryptostorm member to post here Ξ
Ξ any OpenVPN configs found on the forum are likely outdated. For the latest, visit here or GitHub Ξ
Ξ If you're looking for tutorials/guides, check out the new https://cryptostorm.is/#section6 Ξ

[Status] Cantus Non-Operational?

Looking for a bit more than customer support, and want to learn more about what cryptostorm is , what we've been announcing lately, and how the cryptostorm network makes the magic? This is a great place to start, so make yourself at home!
User avatar

Topic Author
parityboy
Site Admin
Posts: 1264
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 3:47 am

[Status] Cantus Non-Operational?

Postby parityboy » Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:36 pm

Apr 14 11:09:17 nm-openvpn[26795]: OpenVPN 2.3.6 x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu [SSL (OpenSSL)] [LZO] [EPOLL] [MH] [IPv6] built on Mar 2 2015
Apr 14 11:09:17 nm-openvpn[26795]: library versions: OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012, LZO 2.06
Apr 14 11:09:17 NetworkManager[878]: <info> VPN connection 'Cantus (Cryptostorm)' (Connect) reply received.
Apr 14 11:09:17 nm-openvpn[26795]: WARNING: No server certificate verification method has been enabled. See http://openvpn.net/howto.html#mitm for more info.
Apr 14 11:09:17 nm-openvpn[26795]: NOTE: the current --script-security setting may allow this configuration to call user-defined scripts
Apr 14 11:09:17 nm-openvpn[26795]: UDPv4 link local: [undef]
Apr 14 11:09:17 nm-openvpn[26795]: UDPv4 link remote: [AF_INET]46.165.222.248:443
Apr 14 11:09:30 nm-openvpn[26795]: [server] Peer Connection Initiated with [AF_INET]46.165.222.248:443
Apr 14 11:09:58 NetworkManager[878]: <warn> VPN connection 'Cantus (Cryptostorm)' (IP Config Get) timeout exceeded.
Apr 14 11:09:58 NetworkManager[878]: <info> Policy set 'Wired connection 1' (eth1) as default for IPv4 routing and DNS.
Apr 14 11:09:58 nm-openvpn[26795]: SIGTERM[hard,] received, process exiting


<Emphasis added>

Another hardware failure a la Turing?



Guest

Re: [Status] Cantus Non-Operational?

Postby Guest » Wed Apr 15, 2015 11:22 am

Can confirm. Connectivity problems started around 2-3 days ago.

User avatar

Pattern_Juggled
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 6:34 am
Contact:

Re: cantus under investigation

Postby Pattern_Juggled » Wed Apr 15, 2015 1:16 pm

I'm still a bit out of the operational loop, but I did overhear df discussing this issue yesterday and I know there's been some testing work going on meanwhile.

That datacentre does get quite a but of packet shrapnel from DDoS attacks running across the backbone interconnects in Frankfurt, but normally that's transient - a few hours here and there. This seems longer-term.

I'll open another staff ticket to be sure there's a resolution quickly... but I suspect that's already well underway if not nearly complete.

Cheers,

~ pj
...just a scatterbrained network topologist & crypto systems architect……… ҉҉҉

    ✨ ✨ ✨
pj@ðëëþ.bekeybase pgpmit pgpðørkßöt-on-consolegit 'er github
bitmessage:
BM-NBBqTcefbdgjCyQpAKFGKw9udBZzDr7f


Guest

Re: [Status] Cantus Non-Operational?

Postby Guest » Wed Apr 15, 2015 2:04 pm

Thx for picking this up so quickly!

I had a server booked in Frankfurt last week and suffered from many downtimes. So this seems to be a pretty massive attack if things are still this bad. I had to ultimately cancle the server because the constant DDOS rendered it unusable. I hope you can achive a better solution with your knowledge. Even though Cantus is only 100MBit/s and a upgrade would be neat, it was always very reliable and so it became my favorite node. <3


Guest

Re: [Status] Cantus Non-Operational?

Postby Guest » Wed Apr 15, 2015 2:08 pm

Cantus is also the most horsey node which makes it super awesome by default.


Return to “cryptostorm in-depth: announcements, how it works, what it is”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

Login